Skip to content
LWNWS
Menu
  • Attorney
  • Case Attorney
  • Case Lawyer
  • Legal Update
  • Law News
  • Law Firm
Menu

NY Appellate Court Affirms Approval of Solar Farm Application Under Prior Zoning Regulations

Posted on 07/11/202208/05/2023 by

This post was authored by Amy Lavine, Esq.

A recent appellate court decision from New York upheld a planning board determination finding that a solar farm application was exempt from newly-enacted restrictions on the sitting of solar energy facilities because the application was pending when the legislation was passed.

The property owner in this case submitted an application for a solar farm in September 2013 and the application was deemed “complete” by the town’s Division of Planning, Environment and Land Management in September 2016. Before the application was decided, the town adopted zoning amendments in November 2016 that restricted permit approvals for solar energy production facilities to “only on those lands previously cleared and/or disturbed on or before January 1, 2016.” The planning board determined that it should consider the solar farm application under the prior zoning code provisions, however, because the legislation also included an “exemption” for applications that had already been deemed “complete,” and in April 2017 it granted site plan and special use permit approvals for the project. The petitioners then commenced this litigation to challenge the planning board’s determination.

The appellate court found affirmed the planning board’s decision and found that it was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion for the planning board to review the solar farm’s application under the zoning criteria that were in place prior to the town’s adoption of the new solar farm restrictions. As the court explained: “Here, the plain language of Local Law 23… exempted the project from the provisions of Local Law 23, including the requirement that permitted solar energy production facilities ‘only on those lands previously cleared and/or disturbed on or before January 1, 2016.’ Further, the Planning Board’s determination that Local Law 23 permitted it to review [the] application using the criteria for a special use permit in place immediately prior to the enactment of Local Law 23 was neither unreasonable nor irrational.”

Matter of Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Orgs., Inc. v Planning Bd. of the Town of Brookhaven, 2022 NY Slip Op 05847 (NY App Div 2d Dept 10/19/22).

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Recent Posts

  • Royal Wedding 2024: News & Photos From Princess Beatrice And Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi’s Wedding Hello!
  • Law News Updates For Advocates, Attorneys, Law Firms, Law College Students Law News Legal News For Law College Students, Advocates, Lawyers, Bar Associations And Supreme Courtroom, High Courtroom Of India
  • Kansas Officials Wish To Amend Election Law After Supreme Courtroom Sided With Voter Advocates

Tags

attorney's attorney at law attorney general's office attorney in fact attorney meaning attorneys or attornies attorneys plural attorney synonym business business law news case law case lawyer college commercial law news corporate law news corporate law news articles corporate legal news criminal law news current legal issues in the news 2021 current legal issues in the news 2022 faculty find a lawyer florida bar find lawyer find lawyers homepage house how to find a lawyer for a lawsuit how to find an attorney by specialty international law firms law news law news websites.. legal update 2022 legal update online national law review news related to law residence school technology trending legal news university washington what does an attorney do where to find a lawyer white and case white law firm

About Us

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Disclosure Policy
© 2026 LWNWS | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme

WhatsApp us