A group of Aston Martin creditors, owed £1.3 billion, has warned they may take legal steps if the luxury carmaker moves forward with selling branding rights tied to its latest debt financing.
The creditors sent a letter before action to the board on Sunday, stating they could seek to reverse the £550 million financing agreement with HPS Investment Partners and prevent the transfer of intellectual property to Authentic Brands Group.
Creditors demand transparency over £550 million deal
The financing, secured in July, consists of a £450 million secured term loan, a £100 million delayed draw term loan, and another £100 million permitted debt facility. An additional £100 million tranche depends on Aston Martin handing over a 50.1% stake in its non-automotive intellectual property to Authentic Brands Group, where HPS also holds an investment.
The carmaker has not shared the full terms of the HPS arrangement with all creditors. Some claim they only discovered the branding transaction after the financing was completed, raising questions about compliance with disclosure rules in distressed financings.
Lawyers who specialize in such disputes explain that creditors frequently challenge deals where a company shifts valuable intangible assets beyond what was initially disclosed. These cases usually depend on intercreditor agreements and default provisions—legal tools firms like Herbert Smith Freehills and Pinsent Masons manage for secured lenders.
The £1.3 billion creditor group must first establish standing under the existing facility documents before taking any court action. Their letter may signal a real legal threat or serve as leverage to push for more transparency.
Related: Finnan loses High Court legal battle
Branding sale could unravel funding lifeline
The carmaker, listed on the London Stock Exchange under the ticker AML.L, has posted losses for years. Sluggish sales in its home market, U.S. tariffs, and weaker demand in China have deepened its financial troubles. The HPS facility was meant to provide breathing room rather than solve cash-flow issues, following two years of cost reductions under CEO Adrian Hallmark.
If the creditors block the Authentic Brands transaction, the company risks losing part of its funding when it needs it most. With few other funding options, the dispute tests how far secured creditors can challenge intellectual property transfers after a financing deal closes.
Aston Martin must now decide whether to reveal the full terms of the HPS arrangement or defend the transaction in court if the creditors follow through. The outcome may influence how similar cases are handled in the future.
The situation also shows the dangers of undisclosed asset transfers in distressed financings. A ruling in favor of the creditors could shape how much control secured lenders maintain over a debtor’s intellectual property after agreements are finalized. Debt restructuring cases often hinge on such details.
Aston Martin did not respond to requests for comment on the letter or the potential legal action.
